Danile Solove of GWU Law School and Chris Hoofnagle of EPIC have jointly produced a model of privacy regulation as a basis for discussion for privacy law reform in the United States. Reading it from a Canadian perspective, it looks a lot like the Canadian Standards Association Model Code for the Protection of Personal Information that is now the law, via the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act.
SSRN-A Model Regime of Privacy Protection by Daniel Solove, Chris Hoofnagle:
Privacy protection in the United States has often been criticized, but critics have too infrequently suggested specific proposals for reform. Recently, there has been significant legislative interest at both the federal and state levels in addressing the privacy of personal information. This was sparked when ChoicePoint, one of the largest data brokers in the United States with records on almost every adult American citizen, sold data on about 145,000 people to fraudulent businesses set up by identity thieves.
In the aftermath of the ChoicePoint debacle, both of us have been asked by Congressional legislative staffers, state legislative policymakers, journalists, academics, and others about what specifically should be done to better regulate information privacy. In response to these questions, we believe that it is imperative to have a discussion of concrete legislative solutions to privacy problems.
What appears below is our attempt at such an endeavor. Privacy experts have long suggested that information collection be consistent with Fair Information Practices. This Model Regime incorporates many of those practices and applies them specifically to the context of commercial data brokers such as Choicepoint. We hope that this will provide useful guidance to legislators and policymakers in crafting laws and regulations. We also intend this to be a work-in-progress in which we collaborate with others. We welcome input from other academics, policymakers, journalists, and experts as well as from the industries and businesses that will be subject to the regulations we propose. We invite criticisms and constructive suggestions, and we will update this Model Regime to incorporate the comments we find most helpful and illuminating. We also aim to discuss some of the comments we receive in a commentary section. To the extent to which we incorporate suggestions and commentary, and if those making suggestions want to be identified, we will graciously acknowledge those assisting in our endeavor.
Notice, Consent, Control, and Access
1. Universal Notice
2. Meaningful Informed Consent
3. One-Step Exercise of Rights
4. Individual Credit Management
5. Access to and Accuracy of Personal Information
Security of Personal Information
6. Secure Identification
7. Disclosure of Security Breaches
Business Access to and Use of Personal Information
8. Social Security Number Use Limitation
9. Access and Use Restrictions for Public Records
10. Curbing Excessive Uses of Background Checks
11. Private Investigators
Government Access to and Use of Personal Data
12. Limiting Government Access to Business and Financial Records
13. Government Data Mining
14. Control of Government Maintenance of Personal Information
Privacy Innovation and Enforcement
15. Preserving the Innovative Role of the States
16. Effective Enforcement of Privacy Rights "
Thanks to PrivacvSpot for the pointer: Draft of a Model Privacy Regime (Part One) | PrivacySpot.com - Privacy Law and Data Protection.