Canadian Privacy Law Blog

The Canadian Privacy Law Blog: Developments in privacy law and writings of a Canadian privacy lawyer, containing information related to the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (aka PIPEDA) and other Canadian and international laws.

Showing posts with label Digital Safety Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Digital Safety Act. Show all posts

Thursday, June 11, 2026

Discussion with Rob Breakenridge: "Protecting kids or deputizing censors? The risks posed by social media ban"

Posted by privacylawyer at 6/11/2026 04:00:00 pm 0 comments
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: Bill C-34, Digital Safety Act, interview, Online Harms, Safe Social Media Act
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

2013 clawbie winner - best practitioner blog

2013 Canadian Law Blog Awards Winner

Links

  • Subscribe to my podcast
  • Now on YouTube: "Canadian PrivacyLawyer" channel
  • Follow me on Twitter: @privacylawyer
  • The Canadian Privacy Law Blog
  • The Canadian Cloud Law Blog
  • Privacy resources
  • David Fraser's profile
  • Privacy Calendar
  • Cloud Computing and Privacy FAQ

Search This Blog

About this site and the author

The author of this blog, David T.S. Fraser, is a Canadian privacy lawyer who is a partner with the firm of McInnes Cooper. He has a national and international practice advising corporations and individuals on matters related to Canadian privacy laws.

For full contact information and a brief bio, please see David's profile.


Please note that I am only able to provide legal advice to clients of my firm. If you have a privacy matter, please contact me about becoming a client. I am not able to provide free legal advice. Any unsolicited information sent to David Fraser may not be protected by solicitor-client privilege.


The views expressed herein are solely the author's and should not be attributed to his employer or clients. Any postings on legal issues are provided as a public service, and do not constitute solicitation or provision of legal advice. The author makes no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained herein or linked to. Due to professional ethics, the author may not be able to comment on matters in which a client has an interest. Nothing herein should be used as a substitute for the advice of competent counsel.


This web site is presented for informational purposes only. These materials do not constitute legal advice and do not create a solicitor-client relationship between you and David T.S. Fraser. If you are seeking specific advice related to
Canadian privacy law or PIPEDA, contact the author, David T.S. Fraser.

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/privacylawyer

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2026 (15)
    • ▼  June (5)
      • Canada's proposed new privacy law: Bill C-36, the ...
      • PIPEDA Replacement Tabled in House of Commons
      • "Online Harms" is back: An overview of Bill C-34 T...
      • Discussion with Rob Breakenridge: "Protecting kids...
      • My discussion with Senator Pamela Wallin: "Privacy...
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2025 (16)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (1)
  • ►  2024 (5)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2023 (7)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2022 (19)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2021 (2)
    • ►  December (2)
  • ►  2020 (5)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2019 (11)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  February (2)
  • ►  2018 (8)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2017 (16)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (3)
  • ►  2016 (12)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2015 (37)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2014 (84)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2013 (85)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (13)
  • ►  2012 (90)
    • ►  December (14)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  February (11)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2011 (130)
    • ►  December (10)
    • ►  November (19)
    • ►  October (9)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (15)
    • ►  March (19)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2010 (155)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (23)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (15)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (13)
  • ►  2009 (131)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (15)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (14)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2008 (279)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (18)
    • ►  September (12)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (25)
    • ►  June (26)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (53)
    • ►  March (28)
    • ►  February (18)
    • ►  January (34)
  • ►  2007 (357)
    • ►  December (31)
    • ►  November (27)
    • ►  October (17)
    • ►  September (47)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (33)
    • ►  June (28)
    • ►  May (23)
    • ►  April (23)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (27)
    • ►  January (60)
  • ►  2006 (586)
    • ►  December (38)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (33)
    • ►  September (33)
    • ►  August (32)
    • ►  July (48)
    • ►  June (56)
    • ►  May (61)
    • ►  April (50)
    • ►  March (38)
    • ►  February (65)
    • ►  January (91)
  • ►  2005 (1152)
    • ►  December (101)
    • ►  November (84)
    • ►  October (100)
    • ►  September (72)
    • ►  August (114)
    • ►  July (112)
    • ►  June (108)
    • ►  May (76)
    • ►  April (121)
    • ►  March (113)
    • ►  February (67)
    • ►  January (84)
  • ►  2004 (545)
    • ►  December (62)
    • ►  November (71)
    • ►  October (80)
    • ►  September (73)
    • ►  August (43)
    • ►  July (27)
    • ►  June (31)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (18)
    • ►  February (37)
    • ►  January (67)
  • ►  1998 (1)
    • ►  April (1)

Labels

information breaches (2048) privacy (1775) health information (307) identity theft (294) surveillance (276) ontario (230) law enforcement (224) alberta (164) cloud computing (142) lawful access (142) google (141) bc (136) patriot act (136) nova scotia (133) breach notification (108) choicepoint (102) facebook (97) laptop (97) video surveillance (95) social networking (93) national security (91) rfid (91) air travel (82) presentations (80) cardsystems (72) australia (68) retention (65) british columbia (62) body scanner (61) europe (61) public sector (59) pipa (58) lawful authority (56) incident (53) airlines (52) phipa (48) outsourcing (47) uk (47) schneier (46) warrants (46) transparency report (45) pipeda findings (44) tort (44) pipeda review (40) ip address (38) litigation (37) cyberbullying (34) vanity (34) retail (32) biometrics (31) criminal law (31) video (31) pipeda (29) Federal Court of Canada (28) media-mention (27) telemarketing (27) csis (26) Canada's Anti-SPAM Law (CASL) (23) aol (23) internet service providers (23) portable storage devices (23) dhs (22) homeland security (22) privacy act (22) humour (21) spam (21) id swiping (20) saskatchewan (20) tjx (20) Gary Dickson (18) Privacy Act (Canada) (18) Cyber-safety Act (Nova Scotia) (17) google street view (17) piidpa (17) pretexting (17) HRSDC Breach (2012) (16) libraries (16) no-fly list (16) facial recognition (15) access to information (14) international travel (14) intrusion upon seclusion (14) Bill C-30 (13) workplace (13) doubleclick (12) loyalty cards (12) privilege (12) swift (12) Bill C-13 (11) C-30 (11) R v Spencer (11) class action litigation (11) universities (11) voyeurism (11) employment (10) UFCW Case (Alberta) (9) pipeda damages (9) Personal Health Information Act (NS) (8) Personal Health Information Protection Act (ON) (8) border (8) charter (8) dncl (8) government (8) production order (8) street view (8) Bill C-22 (7) breach (7) cba (7) cross-border (7) freedom of expression (7) pipeda requests (7) police (7) Bill C-12 (6) Bill C-2 (6) China (6) Viacom v Google (6) fraud (6) search warrant (6) security (6) skype (6) supreme court (6) technology (6) 2007 in review (5) Bill S-4 (5) Right To Be Forgotten (5) Strong Borders Act (5) bullying (5) csec (5) damages (5) dna (5) drones (5) metadata (5) new zealand (5) political parties (5) quebec (5) radwanski scandal (5) research (5) usa patriot act (5) Health Canada Breach (2013) (4) PIPEDA reform (4) Re X (CSIS Act) (4) Rogers (4) Yahoo (4) interview (4) photographing police (4) photography (4) podcast (4) AskThePrivacyLawyer (3) CLOUD Act (3) Digital Privacy Act (3) Online Harms (3) R v Fearon (SCC) (3) RTBF (3) Telus (3) cbsa (3) children (3) conflicts of laws (3) cra (3) hmrc (3) location based services (3) social media (3) Bill C-34 (2) Bill C-36 (2) Bill C-51 - Anti-Terrorism Act 2015 (2) COVID19 (2) CPPA (2) Consumer Privacy Protection Act (2) Digital Charter Implementation Act (2) Health Canada (2) MLAT (2) Newfoundland (2) Online Safety (2) PPCDA (2) Privacy Act (BC) (2) Protecting Privacy and Consumer Data Act (2) Safe Social Media Act (2) advertising (2) annual report (2) bell (2) best of (2) cybersecurity (2) defamation (2) encryption (2) expectation of privacy (2) foipop (NS) (2) guest post (2) intimate images (2) presentation (2) privacy by design (2) publication bans (2) startups (2) tower dumps (2) twitter (2) year in review (2) Age verification (1) April 1 (1) AtlSecCon (1) Bill C-27 (1) Bill C-475 (1) Bill C-63 (1) Bill S-210 (1) Brecknell (1) CYFSA (1) Cambridge Analytica (1) Canadian Security Intelligence Service (1) Charter Statements (1) Data Privacy Day (1) Digital Safety Act (1) ETHI Committee (1) FIPPA (1) Federal Court of Appeal (1) GDPR (1) Legislation (Bills) (1) Missing Persons Act (NS) (1) Nunavut (1) Personal Health Information Act (NL) (1) Privacy Commissioner of Canada (1) Privacy law (1) R v Jarvis (SCC) (1) SAAIA (1) SECU (1) Teksavvy (1) TikTok (1) accountability (1) apple (1) assistance order (1) background checks (1) blackberry (1) california (1) census (1) civil law (1) computer programs (1) consent (1) constitution (1) data subject access requests (1) deepfakes (1) eavesdropping (1) ecpa (1) events (1) evidence (1) false light publicity (1) forensics (1) geolocation (1) goverment (1) htcia (1) human rights (1) incident response (1) india (1) insurance (1) international law (1) japan (1) jurisdiction (1) law reform (1) legal profession (1) malware (1) manitoba (1) media law (1) mobile (1) money laundering (1) multimedia (1) pandemic (1) passports (1) pbd (1) privacy advocacy (1) privacy engineering (1) privacy impact assessment (1) privacy policies (1) privacy statements (1) procurement (1) public health (1) publishing (1) ransomware (1) recording (1) reform (1) research in motion (1) scams (1) schools (1) shaming (1) slaw (1) smartphones (1) software (1) spyware (1) targeted advertising (1) third-party discovery (1) tip (1) transfers for processing (1) trespass (1) tsa (1) videography (1) wireless (1) youth (1)

Licensing terms



Creative Commons LicenseThe Canadian Privacy Law Blog is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Canada License.
Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.