Canadian Privacy Law Blog

The Canadian Privacy Law Blog: Developments in privacy law and writings of a Canadian privacy lawyer, containing information related to the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (aka PIPEDA) and other Canadian and international laws.

Friday, May 04, 2007

New findings from the Federal Commissioner

Just posted:

Commissioner's Findings - Privacy Commissioner of Canada
  • PIPEDA Case summary #371: Building supplier reveals customer’s personal information to contractor
  • PIPEDA Case summary #370: Airline broadens interpretation of personal information and improves handling of personal information access requests
  • PIPEDA Case summary #369: The importance of explaining the reasons for collecting personal information
  • PIPEDA Case summary #368: Insurance adjusters’ consent form considered overly broad
  • PIPEDA Case summary #367: Need to establish procedures for handling access to personal information requests stressed
  • PIPEDA Case summary #366: Auto body shop implements privacy policy and undertakes changes to privacy practices
Posted by privacylawyer at 5/04/2007 02:19:00 pm
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: pipeda findings, privacy

No comments:

Post a comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

2013 clawbie winner - best practitioner blog

2013 Canadian Law Blog Awards Winner

Links

  • The Canadian Privacy Law Blog
  • The Canadian Cloud Law Blog
  • Privacy resources
  • David Fraser's profile
  • Privacy Calendar
  • Cloud Computing and Privacy FAQ

Search This Blog

About this site and the author

The author of this blog, David T.S. Fraser, is a Canadian privacy lawyer who is a partner with the firm of McInnes Cooper. He has a national and international practice advising corporations and individuals on matters related to Canadian privacy laws.

For full contact information and a brief bio, please see David's profile.


Please note that I am only able to provide legal advice to clients of my firm. If you have a privacy matter, please contact me about becoming a client. I am not able to provide free legal advice. Any unsolicited information sent to David Fraser may not be protected by solicitor-client privilege.


The views expressed herein are solely the author's and should not be attributed to his employer or clients. Any postings on legal issues are provided as a public service, and do not constitute solicitation or provision of legal advice. The author makes no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained herein or linked to. Due to professional ethics, the author may not be able to comment on matters in which a client has an interest. Nothing herein should be used as a substitute for the advice of competent counsel.


This web site is presented for informational purposes only. These materials do not constitute legal advice and do not create a solicitor-client relationship between you and David T.S. Fraser. If you are seeking specific advice related to
Canadian privacy law or PIPEDA, contact the author, David T.S. Fraser.

Blog archive

  • ►  2020 (5)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2019 (11)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  February (2)
  • ►  2018 (8)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2017 (16)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (3)
  • ►  2016 (12)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2015 (37)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2014 (84)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (8)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2013 (85)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (13)
  • ►  2012 (90)
    • ►  December (14)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  February (11)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2011 (130)
    • ►  December (10)
    • ►  November (19)
    • ►  October (9)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (15)
    • ►  March (19)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2010 (155)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (23)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (16)
    • ►  April (15)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (13)
  • ►  2009 (131)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (7)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (15)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (14)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2008 (279)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (18)
    • ►  September (12)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (25)
    • ►  June (26)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (53)
    • ►  March (28)
    • ►  February (18)
    • ►  January (34)
  • ▼  2007 (357)
    • ►  December (31)
    • ►  November (27)
    • ►  October (17)
    • ►  September (47)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (33)
    • ►  June (28)
    • ▼  May (23)
      • Federal Commissioner releases annual PIPEDA report
      • Workplace privacy issues - Facebook and blogs
      • Ontario Commissioner releases annual report for '06
      • Incident: Patient information cards sold at auctio...
      • FTC probes Google / Doubleclick merger
      • Privacy, dumpsters, drives and discs
      • Reasonable expectation of privacy videos
      • Google is watching you. No surpise, but privacy re...
      • Why Your Company Needs a Chief Privacy Officer
      • Incident: Private medical records of Colorado resi...
      • Michael Geist: There Will Be No Privacy Reform. Ge...
      • Fact sheet on the Terrorist Identities Datamart En...
      • Incident: Alcatel-Lucent Trying to Find Lost Disk
      • FRONTLINE: Spying on the home front
      • Social Security Cards to go biometric
      • Why does Google remember information about searches?
      • Canada's No-fly list takes to the skies
      • Narcotics diary of FBI agent on EBay
      • WSJ sheds light on TJX breach methods
      • Bush Wants Phone Firms Immune to Privacy Suits
      • New findings from the Federal Commissioner
      • Parliamentary review of PIPEDA: Report
      • Alberta order on consent and withdrawal thereof
    • ►  April (23)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (27)
    • ►  January (60)
  • ►  2006 (586)
    • ►  December (38)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (33)
    • ►  September (33)
    • ►  August (32)
    • ►  July (48)
    • ►  June (56)
    • ►  May (61)
    • ►  April (50)
    • ►  March (38)
    • ►  February (65)
    • ►  January (91)
  • ►  2005 (1152)
    • ►  December (101)
    • ►  November (84)
    • ►  October (100)
    • ►  September (72)
    • ►  August (114)
    • ►  July (112)
    • ►  June (108)
    • ►  May (76)
    • ►  April (121)
    • ►  March (113)
    • ►  February (67)
    • ►  January (84)
  • ►  2004 (545)
    • ►  December (62)
    • ►  November (71)
    • ►  October (80)
    • ►  September (73)
    • ►  August (43)
    • ►  July (27)
    • ►  June (31)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (18)
    • ►  February (37)
    • ►  January (67)

Labels

information breaches (2048) privacy (1768) health information (307) identity theft (294) surveillance (270) ontario (227) law enforcement (220) alberta (162) cloud computing (142) google (141) bc (136) patriot act (136) nova scotia (132) lawful access (128) breach notification (107) choicepoint (102) laptop (97) facebook (95) social networking (93) video surveillance (93) rfid (91) national security (90) air travel (82) presentations (77) cardsystems (72) australia (68) retention (65) british columbia (62) body scanner (61) europe (61) public sector (59) pipa (55) lawful authority (54) airlines (52) incident (51) outsourcing (47) phipa (47) uk (47) schneier (46) transparency report (45) pipeda findings (43) tort (43) warrants (43) pipeda review (40) ip address (38) litigation (37) cyberbullying (34) vanity (34) retail (31) biometrics (29) criminal law (29) media-mention (27) telemarketing (27) Federal Court of Canada (26) csis (25) aol (23) internet service providers (23) portable storage devices (23) dhs (22) homeland security (22) Canada's Anti-SPAM Law (CASL) (21) humour (21) privacy act (21) spam (21) id swiping (20) saskatchewan (20) tjx (20) Gary Dickson (18) Privacy Act (Canada) (18) Cyber-safety Act (Nova Scotia) (17) google street view (17) piidpa (17) pipeda (17) pretexting (17) HRSDC Breach (2012) (16) libraries (16) no-fly list (16) facial recognition (15) international travel (14) intrusion upon seclusion (14) Bill C-30 (13) access to information (13) workplace (13) doubleclick (12) loyalty cards (12) swift (12) Bill C-13 (11) C-30 (11) R v Spencer (11) privilege (11) voyeurism (11) class action litigation (10) universities (10) pipeda damages (9) Personal Health Information Act (NS) (8) Personal Health Information Protection Act (ON) (8) UFCW Case (Alberta) (8) dncl (8) employment (8) government (8) street view (8) border (7) cba (7) pipeda requests (7) police (7) Bill C-12 (6) China (6) Viacom v Google (6) breach (6) charter (6) production order (6) security (6) skype (6) supreme court (6) technology (6) 2007 in review (5) Bill S-4 (5) bullying (5) csec (5) damages (5) dna (5) fraud (5) freedom of expression (5) metadata (5) new zealand (5) political parties (5) quebec (5) radwanski scandal (5) research (5) usa patriot act (5) Health Canada Breach (2013) (4) Re X (CSIS Act) (4) Right To Be Forgotten (4) Rogers (4) Yahoo (4) cross-border (4) AskThePrivacyLawyer (3) Digital Privacy Act (3) R v Fearon (SCC) (3) Telus (3) cbsa (3) cra (3) drones (3) hmrc (3) location based services (3) photography (3) podcast (3) video (3) Bill C-51 - Anti-Terrorism Act 2015 (2) CLOUD Act (2) Health Canada (2) Newfoundland (2) RTBF (2) advertising (2) annual report (2) bell (2) best of (2) defamation (2) encryption (2) expectation of privacy (2) guest post (2) interview (2) photographing police (2) publication bans (2) tower dumps (2) twitter (2) year in review (2) AtlSecCon (1) Bill C-475 (1) COVID19 (1) CPPA (1) ETHI Committee (1) GDPR (1) Legislation (Bills) (1) MLAT (1) Missing Persons Act (NS) (1) Nunavut (1) Personal Health Information Act (NL) (1) Privacy Act (BC) (1) Privacy Commissioner of Canada (1) R v Jarvis (SCC) (1) Teksavvy (1) accountability (1) apple (1) assistance order (1) blackberry (1) california (1) census (1) children (1) civil law (1) conflicts of laws (1) consent (1) constitution (1) ecpa (1) events (1) evidence (1) false light publicity (1) foipop (NS) (1) forensics (1) geolocation (1) goverment (1) india (1) insurance (1) intimate images (1) japan (1) jurisdiction (1) law reform (1) legal profession (1) manitoba (1) mobile (1) money laundering (1) pandemic (1) passports (1) privacy advocacy (1) privacy by design (1) privacy engineering (1) privacy impact assessment (1) privacy statements (1) public health (1) publishing (1) reform (1) research in motion (1) scams (1) search warrant (1) shaming (1) slaw (1) smartphones (1) social media (1) software (1) spyware (1) startups (1) targeted advertising (1) third-party discovery (1) tip (1) transfers for processing (1) tsa (1) wireless (1)

Licensing terms



Creative Commons License
The Canadian Privacy Law Blog is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Canada License.

Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.