Showing posts with label pipeda damages. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pipeda damages. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Henry v Bell Mobility: Another Federal Court case shows PIPEDA damages are hardly worth pursuing absent evidence of actual harm

›
The Federal Court, in the recently issued decision in Henry v Bell Mobility 2014 FC 555 (not yet on CanLII or the Court's site) has awa...
1 comment:
Saturday, November 02, 2013

Some thoughts on Chitrakar v. Bell TV and damage awards under Canadian privacy law

›
On Thursday I posted about the new Federal Court case of Chitrakar v. Bell TV ( Canadian Privacy Law Blog: Federal Court chastises Bell for ...
Friday, November 16, 2012

Federal Court awards minimal damages for good faith violation of PIPEDA by bank

›
The Federal Court of Canada, in Biron v. RBC Royal Bank, 2012 FC 1095 , recently had an opportunity to consider a claim for damages under PI...
Monday, July 09, 2012

Federal Court: No damages for trivial privacy breach

›
Once again, the Federal Court has shown that nominal or no damages will be paid for trivial breaches of PIPEDA. In Townsend v. Sun Life Fina...
Thursday, September 22, 2011

Federal Court slaps law firm for publishing a Privacy Commissioner finding that identified the complainant

›
The Federal Court of Canada has just issued a decision in Girao v. Zarek Taylor Grossman Hanrahan LLP, 2011 FC 1070 (CanLII) , in which it f...
Sunday, August 21, 2011

Federal Court awards minimal damages under PIPEDA

›
The Federal Court has recently released its second decision in which damages have been awarded for a breach under PIPEDA. Once again, the de...
Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Federal Court awards PIPEDA damages due to inaccurate credit report

›
In what appears to be a break from the recent cases that have declined to award damages to applicants under PIPEDA, the Federal Court in Nam...
Friday, November 19, 2010

Federal Court dismisses damages claims, considers what is compensable under PIPEDA

›
Dan Michaluk has a good summary of a very recent case from the Federal Court in Stevens v. SNF Maritime Metal Inc., 2010 FC 1137 , where a c...
Friday, July 09, 2010

Damages under PIPEDA: What does it take to get some damages around here?

›
Dan Michaluk has a great summary of Randall v. Nubodys Fitness Centres , 2010 FC 681 (CanLII) , where the Federal Court was not inclined to ...